NCLD - Research Roundup: (LD News: Summer 2007)
| Print |

Research Roundup (LD News: Summer 2007)

By Dr. Sheldon H. Horowitz
Director of Professional Services, NCLD

The National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities: An Important Resource

Let's call a meeting!  We can brainstorm ideas, achieve consensus, and share what we've decided so others can benefit from our wisdom and respond in ways that build trust, ensure cooperation, and benefit everyone in our extended communities. Sounds easy, right? In reality, the process of achieving consensus is more often than not a long and difficult process. Each person at the table, whether they are offering their own personal perspective or speaking as a representative of a group or organization, must strive to achieve and maintain a balance between their needs and aspirations and those of others who feel equally passionate about the issue at hand. And when learning disabilities (LD) is the topic being discussed, you can bet that those who care most about this population are going to be outspoken advocates for their perspectives, protective of hard-fought battles to ensure access to services and support, and appreciative of the opportunity to participate in the decision-making and consensus-building process that can shape the future of the field of LD. That's precisely what the NJCLD is all about.

An Important Resource

The National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (NJCLD) was founded in 1975 and is composed of representatives of organizations (including NCLD) who are committed to the education and welfare of individuals with learning disabilities. The NJCLD provides an interdisciplinary forum to review issues for educational and governmental agencies, prepares and disseminates statements about key topics, and clarifies important issues in the area of learning disabilities. Over 350,000 individuals constitute the membership of the organizations represented by the NJCLD.

How the NJCLD Works

The NJCLD meets twice a year to consider and discuss contemporary issues in learning disabilities, and to develop and disseminate reports and statements related to these issues. The major purposes of the NJCLD are:

  1. To facilitate communication and cooperation among the member organizations.
  2. To provide an interdisciplinary forum for the review of issues for educational and governmental agencies, and act as a resource committee for those agencies and other interested groups.
  3. To provide a response to national issues in the area of learning disabilities as the need arises.
  4. To seek agreement on major issues/problems pertinent to the area of learning disabilities. 
  5. To prepare and disseminate statements to various publics so as to clarify issues in the area of learning disabilities.
  6. To identify research and service delivery needs in learning disabilities.

The procedures followed when writing statements and position papers provide opportunities for member organizations to speak openly, gather and exchange ideas, deliberate over controversial issues, and modify and revise draft documents until they are acceptable to all the organizations. Members of the NJCLD frequently lead discussions and present consensus documents at national conferences, and the papers generated are of significant value to program and policy decision-makers at the local, state and federal levels.

Member Organizations

Current member organizations of NJCLD are:

Reports and Statements Published by the NJCLD
The following NJCLD resources are available both at LDOnline and on most of the member organizations Websites.

NJCLD Position Statements and White Papers Currently in Development

  • Literacy for Students with Learning Disabilities in Grades 4 and Beyond
    The purpose of this paper is to advocate for effective instruction of students with learning disabilities in the 4th grade and above who struggle with the acquisition of literacy skills. Over the last decade, the emphasis has been on the early acquisition of literacy skills in the primary grades. Literacy development in older children and adolescents is equally important. These students must be accurately defined and receive explicit instruction in basic reading and writing skills as well as the application of these skills at increasing levels of complexity.
  • Validating Learning Disabilities: Conceptual Issues, Challenges, and Implications
    A number of forces have converged in recent years to call into question the validity of the LD construct. The purposes of this paper are to: (a) identify these forces and the resulting contentions that have been voiced regarding the five core elements of the construct of LD (unexpected underachievement, intrinsic processing disorders, relevance of IQ, intra-individual differences, and exclusionary criteria); (b) discuss the essential shared understandings we hold regarding the nature of disability and the nature of learning, because these understandings have a direct bearing on how we define the construct of LD and how we operationalized that definition for purposes of assessment, evaluation, identification, placement, and service; and (c) propose recommendations for practitioners, researchers, and policymakers about how to deal with the contentions that exist.

 

Additional Resources
Visit NCLD’s LDInfoZone for more information on the National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (NJCLD)

Research Roundup Archive


Any comments or feedback you would like to share about this column or other LD.org information would be greatly appreciated! Please address your e-mail to  This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .  This email address is being protected from spam bots; you need Javascript enabled to view it and be sure to include a topic or key words in the subject line.

Did you enjoy this article? Would you like to help support NCLD programs? Click here to become a FRIEND of NCLD today.